Wednesday, June 29, 2011
Friday, June 24, 2011
Stop serving the interests of our enemies
Dr Babu Suseelan
Of Course India is a corrupt country. The reasons are many. For thousands of years Indias have been subjected to inhuman slavery by Islamic invaders and Christian colonialists. The majority Hindus were forced to misinterpret their scriptures, cuklture and adopat alien way of life for survival. Due to corruption, our life is in mortal danger. Why? Most of our institutions are in danger.Not all will be saved, and perhaps not all deserve to be saved. There are corruption, religious conversion, Jihadi terrorism, public looting, Black money, Hawala transaction, bogus secularism falling educational system looting of temple wealth. We have no obligation to save them simply because they exist.
We should not blame authentic real Hindu Dharma for these social, political ills. Phony secularism, irrational tolerance, unreasonable compromise, alien culture and slavery have corrupted our Hindu Dharma and culture. We have deviated from our scriptures, traditions, and clear-correct and comprehensive philosophy. WE have borrowed from alien culture by compulsion, slavery, invasion and threats. We have also borrowed dangerous concepts like Ahimsa, all religions are the same, let everybody live according to their whims and fancy etc. These alien concepts have corrupted our will to live a decent life. We start tolerating intolerant ideology and intolerant people in the name of compromise. We start compromising with deviant dogmas, corrupt life style, and dangerous politicians and atheist, immoral, ant social leaders.
The answer to these social-political-psychological problem, I think is that we share an uncommon devotion to phony secularism, transient values, and tolerate corrupt, immoral politicians and uneducated, foreign born, immoral leaders to lead the nation. The immoral, corrupt politicians and the foreign owned media is engaged in a psychological warfare to make the majority Hindus zombies and drift aimlessly.Efforts to reeducate them,and preferably to keep them assertive and proud of real culture is national necessity.
Now let me be clear on one major point. There is nothing inherently wrong in our temple offerings. What is wrong is our inability to protect our temple wealth, preserve our authentic Hindu teaching and promoting our real Dharma. Hindutva never wanted us to compromise with alien ideologies or dogma, Hindutva never wanted us to tolerate corruption or never taught us that all religions are the same. Our traditional belief system is erased, reformulated and re fabricated to suit corrupt politicians, mullahs, missionaries, miscreants and criminals. Our enemies want us to be satisfied with meaningless abstract discussion, so that our enemies can mold us, exploit us and continue looting our temple wealth and empty national treasury for their whimsical life and continue their profit. The role of Hindus is awesome. Simple condemnation of such atrocities is not enough. These criminals are not willing to change their deviant behavior or apocalyptic ideologies.It would be foolish to continue our tolerance of intolerance and compromise with deviant people.It is crucial for us not to continue the system. A frontal attack on our education is the first step. Our enemy use the contaminated educational system for the purpose of keeping us in denial. We have to break the thick wall of denial, apathy, inaction, pacifism, indifference and tolerance of intolerance. The corrupt system will be finally destroyed only when a revolutionary social-religious-political-psychological system permits Hindu's need for political-social power is met in ways that do enable us to kick out corrupt politicians out once for all.If Hindus are clever enough, it is time to wake up.We have been serving the interests of our enemies for long. Let us join together and take appropriate action. We could survive the destruction of the corrupt system.
Monday, June 20, 2011
God save India from Italian Mafiosi
V.SUNDARAM I.A.S.
ALL INDIA GENERAL SECRETARY (IDEOLOGY) JANATA PARTY
AUTOCRATIC AUTHORITARIAN AUDACIOUS ADAMANTINE ALPINE SUPERCILIOUS CORRUPTION OF SONIA GANDHI!!
“ The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. ” --- Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
Dr.Subramanian Swamy has sent a letter dated 20 th June 2011 to the Prime Minister Dr.Manmohan Singh inviting his attention to his earlier letter of 15 th April 2011 in which he had sought the Permission of the Prime Minister to prosecute Sonia Gandhi, the Chairman of the National Advisory Council (NAC) and Chairman of the UPA Coordination Committee under the Prevention of Corruption Act. In today’s letter of 20 th June, Dr.Subramanian Swamy has come forward to assist the Prime Minister in going through the tortuous process of getting the necessary documents from the Swiss authorities in order to hasten the process of bringing back Black Money deposited abroad with impunity by Sonia Gandhi and her family. I am presenting below the full text of this letter of 20 th June 2011 sent to the Prime Minister which speaks for itself.
June 20, 2011.
Dr. Manmohan Singh,
Prime Minister of India,
South Block,
New Delhi.
Dear Prime Minister:
You may recall that I had submitted on April 15, 2011, a 225-page petition seeking your permission {viz., Sanction u/s 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (1988)} to prosecute Ms. Sonia Gandhi.
Ms. Gandhi has been a public servant since 1991, initially by virtue of getting the 10, Janpath, New Delhi, a Government house, allotted to her as her residence for life. Since 2004 she has been the Chairperson of the National Advisory Council with Cabinet rank and which is serviced administratively by the Cabinet Secretariat.
According to submissions and documentation in my petition, Ms. Sonia Gandhi is culpable of having committed a criminal offence e.g., u/s 13 of the afore-referred to Act, in the Bofors scam and hence the criminal law has to be set into motion for which I first need your Sanction.
According to the CVC direction on grant of Sanction, you have to decide within three months, i.e., July 15, 2011, whether or not to grant me Sanction.
I shall be at Harvard University from June 23rd to August 10th. If therefore I am not informed by you upon my return whether or not I have been granted Sanction, I shall be compelled to approach the Courts against your failure to perform your statutory duty under Section 19 of the said Act.
I have also established by some credible documentation that Ms. Sonia Gandhi is the legatee of an illegal bank account, and of a Trust, in Switzerland that was earlier in the name of her now deceased husband Mr. Rajiv Gandhi. From this bank account, payments were made to pay the tuition fees and other expenses of her son Mr. Rahul Gandhi when he was in college in USA, briefly at Harvard in 1990-91 before he was compelled by circumstances to quit, then later at Rollins College, a Catholic Christian establishment, near Orlando, Florida.
Hence the money trail from this illegal account can be tracked in view of the Amendment to the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between Switzerland and India, recently passed by Swiss Parliament on June 17, 2011, when read with Restitution of Illicit Assets of Politically Empowered Persons Act (2010) passed earlier by Swiss Parliament.
I am prepared to assist your Government to get the necessary documents from the Swiss authorities if you are serious about the matter of bringing back such black money deposited abroad. The procrastination in the Lichtenstein Bank matter however is not inspiring.
Yours sincerely,
( SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY )
In this context, in order to assist my Readers, I am presenting below some of the crucial and relevant excerpts from the more than 200 page earlier Petition of Dr.Subramanian Swamy sent to the Prime Minister Dr.Manmohan Singh on 15 th April 2011 in which he had sought the permission of the Prime Minister to prosecute Sonia Gandhi u/s 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (1988) [PCA]
The Petition
15 April 2011
Dr. Manmohan Singh
Prime Minister as Sanctioning Authority
u/s 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (1988) [PCA]
South Block, New Delhi.
Re: Sanction to prosecute Ms. Sonia Gandhi, Chairperson (in Cabinet Rank), NAC, under Prevention of Corruption Act (1988).
Dear Sir:
1. Ms. Sonia Gandhi MP, wife of the deceased Rajiv Gandhi, was first appointed as Chairperson National Advisory Council [NAC] in May 2004. She resigned in 2006 but was re-appointed by an Order of the Cabinet Secretariat dated March 29, 2010, read with Order dated October 8, 2010 [Annexure 1].
2. As per Order of May 31, 2004 [Annexure 2] the Prime Minister’s Office will provide Central Government funds to meet the expenditure of the NAC, and service the NAC for its secretarial needs. Hence she is a public servant as defined in Section 2 ( c ) of the Prevention of Corruption Act (1988).
3. You, in your capacity as deemed appointing authority are therefore the Designated Authority under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for granting Sanction to prosecute the said Ms. Sonia Gandhi. As you know, there are no laches or statute of limitations for prosecuting offences of corruption.
4. Your Sanction is required by me for prosecuting Ms. Sonia Gandhi on a private complaint proposed to be filed by me in the criminal court under Prevention of Corruption Act (1988), based on the materials available to me (and enclosed with this letter/application) with reference to two issues: ……… …….. …………. …………
27. This complaint against Sonia Gandhi also includes the corrupt monies held under her control in the tax haven of Switzerland as a legatee of the corrupt money which was banked in the name of her late husband or deposited by her of funds obtained from the erstwhile KGB, the Soviet Union’s Intelligence Agency, or by sale of illegally exported antiques in the country. I retain the right to submit details of other illegal accounts in other havens such as Macao at a later stage in another application to you or before the court.
28. It is well-reported that Sonia Gandhi is the beneficiary of Rajiv Gandhi’s estate which includes the corrupt monies continued even now to be held in a tax havens. Why this money is held abroad (even if held as a trust to benefit family members) instead of its being held in India within the Indian financial system to benefit the nation is a question which Ms. Sonia Gandhi must answer.
29. Violations of FEMA have occurred as also under Prevention of Money Laundering Act. In case any transaction on this account which is not reported in the Income Tax Returns, and FCRA is also a violation. There may also be an issue of obtaining RBI prior permission for holding such large sums abroad if it is claimed to be a legitimate account.
30. It is clear that this wealth was not reported in Election Affidavits of Sonia Gandhi & Rahul Gandhi as a beneficiary of the monies so held [Annexure 6]. The total wealth of both Gandhis, as per their election returns, is just Rs 363 lakh, Sonia owns no car. “
31. When Schweizer Illustrierte a prestigious German-language Swiss magazine alleged that Rajiv Gandhi held an illegal account in Swiss banks of about US $ 2 billion, neither she nor her son, protested, or sued the magazine, then or later [Annexure 7].
32. When major papers, The Hindu and The Times of India included, had carried in the year 1992 the official confirmation of KGB payments to the Rajiv Gandhi family, adding that the Russian government owned the payments in the disclosures, neither of the two Gandhis challenged or sued them [Annexure 8].
33. Nor did they sue Dr. Yevgenia Albats, a member of the official Commission on KGB Operations set up by President Yeltsin, when she wrote about KGB payments to Rajiv Gandhi and family in her book The State within State [Annexure 9]
34. More than $ 2 billion in 1991 was being held by Ms. Sonia Gandhi as a legatee, or otherwise obtained by receiving stolen movable and immovable properties, monies and securities, kept illegally in tax haven banks of Switzerland and elsewhere, and which is disproportionate to her known sources of income. She thus has also committed offence u/s 13(1)(e) of PCA. It also attracts the IPC Sections for receiving stolen property.
35. The recent deposition of Hasan Ali, alleged to have siphoned money of the nation to Switzerland secret accounts admits to his close association not only with her but with Mr. Ahmed Patel MP and political adviser to Ms. Sonia Gandhi [Annexure 10].
36. Ms. Sonia Gandhi is also obviously culpable under Indian criminal law such as FCRA for the pay offs in the Iraqi Oil-for-Food scam of 2002. The United Nations had set up an independent inquiry committee under Dr. F. Volcker which found that the “Congress Party” headed by Ms. Sonia Gandhi as a beneficiary of a free oil quota from the now deposed and deceased dictator Saddam Hussein, which the beneficiary sold at market price through Marc Rich, the notorious swindler who had been convicted by a US Court for 350 years and several million dollars as fine. He was pardoned by US President Clinton in 2000 on Israeli Prime Minister’s intervention. He lives in Switzerland.
37. No one in Congress Party but Ms. Sonia Gandhi as party President could have been this beneficiary. The other beneficiary listed in Volcker’s Report was by name: Natwar Singh, who got much less [Annexure 11].
38. I reserve the right to further petition you to enlarge the scope of this sanction at a future date to include other violations and offences committed by Ms. Sonia Gandhi under Prevention of Corruption Act (1988), for which I will file with you a separate application if necessary.
40. Ms. Sonia Gandhi is habitually committing acts of corruption since 1972. On November 19, 1974, I brought it to the attention of the Rajya Sabha that Ms. Sonia Gandhi, then an Italian citizen had functioned as a benami insurance agent of public sector insurance companies, and giving her address as 1, Safdarjung Road, New Delhi which was then the official residence of the Prime Minister of India. She thus committed an offence under FERA. The then Prime Minister Mrs. Indira Gandhi subsequently informed the Rajya Sabha that following my disclosure, Ms. Sonia Gandhi had resigned from this agency earning commissions.
41. Between January 25, 1973 and January 21, 1975 she held a post of Managing Director of Maruti Technical Services on a salary despite it being an offence under FERA. But then she had become Managing Director of Maruti Heavy Vehicles Pvt. Ltd. with an even bigger remuneration. For neither post she had the necessary qualifications having never passed even high school. The Justice A.C. Gupta Commission appointed in 1977 by the Janata Party Government found her guilty of multiple offences under FERA and IPC.
42. In 1980 and January 1983 Ms. Sonia Gandhi then still an Italian citizen enrolled herself as a voter in the New Delhi constituency despite having been struck off the list in 1982 upon the ERO receiving a complaint from a citizen. She thus committed an offence under Section 31 of the Representation of the People’s Act read with Form 4 of the Registration of Electors Rules (1960).
43. Ms. Sonia Gandhi’s Indian citizenship acquired in record speed in April 1983 is vitiated by her incomplete answers to mandatory questions in the citizenship forms. She did not submit documents from the Italian government of relinquishing her Italian citizenship required for Indian citizenship, stating in the Form that it was ‘not applicable” [Annexure 12]. Italian Embassy in New Delhi simply affirmed what she told them and hence that cannot be taken as a valid document of relinquishment for the purposes of citizenship. She also retrieved her Italian passport in 1992 after citizenship laws in Italy were amended which under Section 10 of the Citizenship Act (1955) means cancellation of her Indian citizenship.
44. All these facts stated above were put together and published in USA in a full page advertisement in the New York Times in 2008 by NRIs N. Kataria and others. The Congress Party unit in USA thereafter engaged the most expensive law firm and filed a $200 million defamation suit. However Ms. Sonia Gandhi refused to appear in the witness box and be cross examination. Therefore, Justice Emily Goodman of the New York State Supreme Court dismissed the suit since defamation suits in law have to be filed by the person claiming to be defamed, and therefore cannot be assigned to others [Annexure 13]. Ms. Sonia Gandhi had a case to rebut these facts, then why she failed to turn up in court?
SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY
It should be clear from paragraph 31 of Dr.Subramanian Swamy’s Petition cited above that when SCHWEIZER ILLUSTRIERTE a prestigious German-language Swiss magazine alleged that Rajiv Gandhi held an illegal account in Swiss banks of about US $ 2 billion, neither Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi nor her son Rahul Gandhi ever protested, or attempted to sue the SCHWEIZER ILLUSTRIERTE magazine, then or later. I am presenting below the concerned pages from SCHWEIZER ILLUSTRIERTE in which the former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi’s picture appeared in 1991.
The money movements of this transaction reported in 1991 in SCHWEIZER ILLUSTRIERTE have to be tracked down and brought back to India. As Dr. Manmohan Singh, the thoroughly corrupt and supremely incompetent Prime Minister of India ---a petty and shameless slave in the bonded labour of the Italian Dictator Sonia Gandhi—is not capable of initiating any criminal action against Sonia Gandhi, Dr.Subramanian Swamy has sought the permission of the Prime Minister to prosecute Sonia Gandhi under the Prevention Of Corruption Act (1988).
The Indian National Congress ----a wholly owned Private Company of the
Italian (Mussolini type) Fascist Dictator Sonia Gandhi—has DEGENERATED INTO ANTI-NATIONAL ANTI-SOCIAL ANTI-INDIAN
ITALIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS committed to the mercenary, nay missionary, cause of Gargantuan Global Corruption of Sonia Gandhi and all the members of her family. In this Italian mafia game of trans-national corruption, she is duly assisted by first rate political cronies like Former Finance Minister Pa Chidambaram and the Present Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee who are all playing ducks and drakes with the economy of India and the helpless lives of our teeming millions.
In his recent book on 2G Spectrum Scam, a gigantic loot of public money in which former Union Telecom Minister Raja functioned as a willing and submissive conduit pipe for Sonia Gandhi and her family, Dr.Subramanian Swamy has brilliantly concluded: “ Corruption misallocates resources from the meritorious to the unworthy, the immoral, the criminal, the powerful or the illegitimately rich.”
SUPER SONIA’S TRANSNATIONAL CORRUPTION AND VAST RESERVES OF UNACCOUNTED BLACK MONEY STASHED AWAY IN SWISS BANKS AND OTHER TAX HAVENS HAS PRECISELY LED TO SUCH DISASTROUS CONSEQUENCES FOR HELPLESS INDIA AND HER EVEN MORE HELPLESS INDIAN PEOPLE.
All the people of India have to come together in the next General Elections to democratically throw out the Italian National Congress of Sonia Gandhi from power in the Government of India in New Delhi. Sonia Gandhi can be legitimately described as the female Alberto Fujimori of India. The people of Peru finally waged a united battle to throw out the corrupt, cruel and callous Dictator Alberto Fujimori of Japanese origin. Likewise the people of India have to come together to throw out the cold blooded corrupt Italian Dictator Sonia Gandhi from the sacred soil of India. This Italian dictator is capable of letting loose unprovoked state violence (with the help of her crooked cronies like Pa Chidambaram and Kapil Sibal) against the peace loving citizens of India. The barbarous violence let loose against Baba Ramdev and thousands of his followers who were peacefully sleeping in an enclosed shamiana on Ram Lila Grounds in New Delhi on the midnight of June 4-5 2011 should be viewed as an authentic pointer of the shape of things to come for the citizens of India.
Rahul as PM -Survey; After Paid Reports now come Paid Titles!
HK
“More and More Indians want Rahul as PM : Survey” - This is the title of IANS report published by our medias. Those who kept a bowl of salt to take a pinch from it while reading the reports should from now on keep a sack full of salt to take a hand full!
The Survey conducted by Lenson news highlights two main points
http://www.lensonnews.com/lensonarticles/2/2/3193/1/poll-finds-people-want-leadership-change;-rahul-gandhi-preferred-over-manmohan-modi-over-rahul.html
1)63% ; ie Two Thirds of the voters want a change of government.2
2)52% of respondents interviewed all over the country (52%) chose Narendra Modi as the preferred PM candidate over Rahul Gandhi trailing at 40%.
What the IANS title hype about is when asked about who between Manmohan Singh and Rahul Gandhi would make a better prime minister, 45% think that Rahul Gandhi would make a better PM than Manmohan Singh 34% .
Haven't seen any media houses coming forward to publish this story as More and More Indians want Modi as PM: Survey
Muslim appeaser politicians turning India into an Islamic State, Part 2
Dr Radhasyam Brahmachari
Muslim appeasement by the UPA government:
In the previous article, it has been mentioned how the present United Progressive Alliance (UPA) coalition government in Delhi, under the leadership of Indian National Congress (INC) party is appeasing the Muslims of India with unfair, undemocratic, non-secular and even illegal
The reader may gauge the extent of Muslim appeasement by the UPA government from the statement of its PM Manmohan Singh. He has said that the Muslims are the first to claim the produce of India. What is the basis of such a stupid comment? Does the Muslim contribute maximum share of India’s GDP? How aggressively the Congress is wooing the Muslim community nationally is evident from the a recent comment by another leader Digvijay Singh, who, while referring to the killing of Osama bin Laden, reverentially said “Osamaji” and bemoaned why the terrorist leader was not given a proper burial.
To please the Muslims further, the said UPA government has drafted a bill called “Prevention of Communal and Targeted Violence (Access to Justice and Reparation) Bill, 2011” and is intending to place the same in the Parliament in the coming Monsoon Session. If the bill gets approval of the Parliament and becomes a law, the Muslims will be supreme lords of the country while majority Hindus will be dragged into slaves of the Muslims.
The drafting of the Communal Violence Bill:
The draft of the so called Prevention of Communal and Targeted Violence (Access to Justice and Repatriation) Bill, 2011, has been prepared by the National Advisory Council (NAC), headed by Sonia Gandhi, the president of INC. It has been agreed by the NAC at its meeting on July 14th, 2010, the NAC Working Group on the Communal Violence Bill, has set up an Advisory Group and a Drafting Committee to develop a draft bill on communal and sectarian violence. The draft a bill should aim to provide effective prevention and control of communal and sectarian violence, and justice and comprehensive reparations to survivors and victims of communal and sectarian violence. This would be ensured on the basis of certain essential elements accepted by people’s groups, civil society groups and the NAC, including the key principle of accountability of public officials. While framing the draft, the relevant provisions, including rules, for relief, compensation, rehabilitation, resettlement, restitution, and reparations, keeping in mind the rights of internally displaced persons.
The following are the members of the Advisory Group Members Communal & Sectarian Violence Bill, 2010 Advisory
Group
(1) Abusaleh Shariff, (2) Asgar Ali Engineer, (3) Gagan Sethi, (4) H.S Phoolka, (5) John Dayal, (6) Justice Hosbet Suresh, (7) Kamal Faruqui, (8) Manzoor Alam, (9) Maulana Niaz Farooqui, (10) Ram Puniyani, (11) Rooprekha Verma, (12) Samar Singh, (13) Saumya Uma, (14) Shabnam Hashmi, (15) Sister Mary Scaria, (16) Sukhdeo Thorat, (17) Syed Shahabuddin, (18) Uma Chakravarty, (19) Upendra Baxi, (20) Aruna Roy, NAC Working Group Member, (21) Professor Jadhav, NAC Working Group Member and (22) Anu Aga, NAC Working Group Member
The Joint Conveners of the Advisory Group are (1) Farah Naqvi, Convener, NAC Working Group and (2) Harsh Mander, Member, NAC Working Group
The members of the Drafting Committee are (1) Gopal Subramanium, (2) Maja Daruwala, (3) Najmi Waziri, (4) P.I. Jose, (5) Prasad Sirivella, (6) Teesta Setalvad, (7) Usha Ramanathan (upto 20 Feb 2011) and (8) Vrinda Grover (upto 20 Feb 2011).
The conveners of Drafting Committee are (1) Farah Naqvi, Convener, NAC Working Group and (2) Harsh Mander, Member, NAC Working Group
The key Guiding Principles laid down before the drafting committee are
(1) Broaden title and applicability of the law to include ‘communal & sectarian violence’,
(2) Shift from empowering the State, to seeking action & accountability of State/public officials,
(3) Basic framework of law must not rest on declaration of “disturbed areas”,
(4) Need for an independent National Authority to ensure effective compliance with the law, without disturbing the federal structure,
(5) Ensure accountability & criminal liability of public officials for acts of omission & commission, for preventing or controlling communal & sectarian violence, or extending timely and adequate rescue, relief and rehabilitation,
(6) Incorporate the doctrines of Command & Superior responsibility,
(7) Definition of communal & sectarian violence to cover both isolated incidents as well as mass crimes, against people based on religious, caste, linguistic, regional and other identities,
(8) Need to specifically define and include new crimes/offences including sexual assault, enforced disappearances, torture, long-lasting social & economic boycott, and genocide, among others,
(9) Need to remove prior sanction requirement for Hate Speech (Sec. 153A & 153B – IPC),
(10) Statutory obligation on government to lay down national standards for the entire spectrum of provisions for victims – including rescue, relief, compensation, rehabilitation, resettlement, restitution, reparation and recognizing the rights of internally displaced persons,
(11) Implementation according to the norms in point 10 to be a statutory obligation under this law,
(12) Compensation amounts to be specified in terms of national norms under the law, and revised every 3 yrs and
(13) Need for amendments in CrPC and Indian Evidence Act to meet extraordinary circumstance of communal & sectarian violence to protect victims’ rights. In addition to that,
(14) specific provisions for victim-witness rights to be made under this law
The list of people as given above for guiding, monitoring and preparing the draft of the Communal Violence Bill 2011, one finds that all of them are loyal to the Nehru-Gandhi family. Many of them operate several NGOs and it is well known that an NGO is very efficient instrument to siphon public money. In addition to that, these committees were formed without any approval of the Parliament. So, while commenting on the formation of the committee, Sam Rajappa, in his article Communal Violence Bill says, “The very fact that Parliament was bypassed and the undemocratic National Advisory Council, acting as a supra Parliament, was entrusted the task of drafting the most sensitive legislation, makes the UPA government a suspect. Harsh Mander and Farah Naqvi, conveners of the advisory group to prepare the draft Bill, are known for bashing Narendra Modi, Chief Minister of Gujarat, and do not enjoy the confidence of the public” (The Statesman, June 4, 2011)..
“The NAC is a conglomeration of NGO members handpicked by Sonia Gandhi for their faith in the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty. Most of these NGOs are foreign-funded and they act according to the wishes of donors. It is indirect interference in the affairs of the nation by foreign countries. The NAC chairperson has become a supra Prime Minister and an instrument for maladministration”, Rajappa adds.
Salient points of the draft:
The most crucial part of the draft for the Communal Violence Bill 2011 is the definition of the term ‘group’. The basis of such groupings may be religion, mother tongue, ethnicity and caste, e.g. schedule castes and schedule tribes. The next important step is to decide whether a group consists of the people of minority or the majority community. In India as a whole, Hindus are a majority and Muslims and Christian are a minority, on the basis of religion. Based on this criterion, the draft proceeds to designate any group consisting of Hindus as a group of majority, while a group consisting of Muslims and Christians as a group of minority community. But such identification is utterly faulty.
There are so many states, e.g. Jammu and Kashmir, Punjab, Mizoram, Manipur, Meghalaya and Nagaland, and in the Andaman and Nicobar islands, where Hindus are minorities. So, in those states Hindus are deserved to be considered a religious minority. The most astonishing as well as ridiculous part of the draft Bill is that, communal troubles are created only by members of the majority community or the Hindus. From this basic presumption it comes out that for any incident of communal violence, only Hindus will be held responsible and punished. So, for any incident of communal violence between Hindus and Muslims in Jammu and Kashmir, where Muslims constitute more than 80% of the population, they will be considered a minority group and only Hindus will be held responsible and punished. Or in other words, if the Muslims in Jammu and Kashmir persecute the Hindus and massacre them en masse, even then the Hindus will be considered offenders and punished, while Muslims will not be held responsible.
Similar is the case for the states Mizoram, Manipur, Meghalaya and Nagaland, where Christians are majority and the Hindus are minorities. In the above mentioned states the Christian missionaries are carrying on ceasasionist movements. They have formed militant terrorist gangs and oppressing the Hindus. If the draft becomes a law, only the Hindus would be held guilty of such a violence and let the perpetrators go scot free, as they have labeled as a minority group. So, the draft Bill proceeds on the presumption that communal violence is created only by the majority community (Hindus) and never by members of the minority communities.
But history tells us that, so far violence between the Hindus and the Muslims is concerned, in almost all the cases, the Muslims are the initiators of the violence. The Mopla Riot in Malabar, Kerala, is one of the most famous incident of Hindu Muslim violence, was initiated by the Muslims (called Moplahs) on August 20, 1921. Instead of calling it a Hindu-Muslim riot, it would be proper to designate it as Hindu pogrom by the Moplahs. Another famous incident of communal violence is the “Great Calcutta Killings” that took place in August, 1946. It is also called the “Direct Action Day” by the historians. August 16 was Friday and that too in the month of Ramadan according to the Arabic calendar. It was therefore the holy day of the holiest month for the Muslims. On that holy day, lakhs of Muslims gathered under the Ochterlony Monument (now Shahid Minar) to offer midday holy Jumma prayer. After finishing the prayer, Muslims started to attack Hindus, killing Hindus, looting Hindu shops, setting Hindu shops and Hindu houses on fire. The killing of Hindus went on for several days.
Vultures feed on corpses of Hindu victims in Calcutta, August, 1946
Many hold this misconception that the 2002 Gujarat violence was initiated by the Hindus. But in reality, the violence was initiated by the Muslims by setting the coach S-6 of the Sabarmati Express on fire on February 27 at Godhra and burning 59 Hindu devotees, including women and children, alive. This barbaric incident initiated the communal violence in Gujarat that claimed over 1,200 lives. So, many called this Gujarat Violence as post Godhra Violence.
The coach S-6 of Sabarmati Express burning at Godhra
So, it can be shown that in every incident of Hindu-Muslim violence, Muslims are responsible. It is due to the fact that the Islamic holy book Koran spews hatred against the non-Muslims, including the Hindus and the Islamic doctrine of jihad inspire the Muslims to kill them, set their houses on fire, loot their wealth and riches, rape their women, occupy their tilling land, convert them by force and so on and so forth. But the holy books of the Hindus do not teach such hatred and oppress the non-Hindus. So, the presumption of the Communal Violence Bill 2011 that majority Hindus should be held responsible and punished for any incident Hindu-Muslim communal violence is patently discriminatory, undemocratic and non-secular. Such a view is totally opposed to the secular principle laid down in the Constitution of India that holds ‘an offence is an offence and the offender should be punished, irrespective of to what group he belongs’.
The other devastating provision:
The other devastating provision of the draft is that, if an individual of the minority community brings an allegation of propagation of hate against an individual belonging to the majority, police will have the right to arrest him without any investigation and put him behind the bar. The victim would not even have the right to know from whom the complaint has come. During trial, the complainant would not have any responsibility to establish his allegation, and it would be the sole responsibility of the victim to prove his innocence.
It is needless to say that this provision, if it becomes a law, would equip the UPA government to victimize any of its political rivals, and send him to prison. Suppose a fictitious man brings an allegation of propagating hate speech against Narendra Modi, the chief minister of Gujarat, the police will have the right to arrest him immediately and put him in prison. He will be released if and only if he succeeds to prove himself innocent. So, Arindam Chaudhuri, an author, has said that the bill is to kill secularism in India (The Pioneer, June 4, 2011). He has also said, “The NAC-drafted Communal Violence Bill is a recipe for unmitigated disaster. In the guise of promoting communal harmony it promotes rank communalism. In the guise of protecting minorities, it attacks Hindu rights. This Bill will strike at the very foundation of liberty and legitimise criminal misdeeds of Muslims. It must not become law.”
Conclusion:
From the discussion presented above, it appears that the draft of the Communal Violence Bill 2011 has been framed with a strong motive of Hindu bashing. The contents of the draft grossly violate the sacrosanct principle of secularism, democracy and equality enshrined in the Constitution of India and if it becomes a law, it would be a disaster for the Hindus. Though it is doubtful whether such a draconian bill could survive even a preliminary scrutiny of the Supreme Court of India, the Hindus should raise their voice across the country so that the bill gets defeated in the Parliament. If this bill is passed by the Parliament and becomes a law, it will undoubtedly push India a step towards Islamization.
Sunday, June 19, 2011
Fate of a Love Jihad victim - Hindu girl dies in street accident, Muslim fiance flees with jewels
Delhi girl dies in accident, fiance flees with jewels
http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-06-14/bangalore/29656416_1_fiance-delhi-girl-bmtc-bus
BANGALORE: A 22-year-old woman from Delhi succumbed to her injuries and her fiance miraculously escaped with minor injuries after their autorickshaw was knocked down by a speeding BMTC bus in Yeshwantpur on Sunday night.
The deceased, identified as Poonam Rajput, and her fiance, Rasheed, had eloped from Dehli and stayed in Yeshwantpur for four months. They were heading towards a shopping mall in Malleswaram when the accident took place near Yeshwantpur 9th cross.
Investigating officials said Rasheed fled the scene with the victim's jewels soon after she was taken to a nearby private hospital.
Saturday, June 18, 2011
India needs a social revolution
Dr. Babu Suseelan
India is facing alarming social-political-cultural problems. Intellectuals, nationalist political leaders, and patriotic news papers give considerable attention to the real aspects of our social problems. There is a general agreement that corruption, social stratification, money laundering, hawala transaction, black money, murder for hire, crime violence, coercive religious conversion, Jihadi terrorism, social unrest by Maoist and missionary misfits, border disorder, Chinese and Pakistani border intrusion, Jihadi infiltration from Pakistan and Bangladesh, looting by our corrupt political rulers are rampant in India.
But on such severe issues there is much less agreement on how to solve these pertinent social problems threatening India. Why? Political leaders of the corrupt Congress ruling party of the center headed by the uneducated, Italian born catholic Sonia Maino and many anti-national regional parties (DMK of Karunanidhi, Bhajan Samaj Party of Mayavathi, Samajvadi Party of Mulayam Singh Yadav, Marxist Party of Pinaroy Vijayan and Karrat) have different interpretations on the conditions that many people consider undesirable that affects many people in India. Radical Muslims, conversion mafia, missionary misfits, Marxist criminals, bogus secular leaders and the corrupt congress party have different interpretations and view these social problems as beneficial for their survival. The elite party leaders benefit and become rich by looting and resorting to deceptive and corrupt means. But there are few befits for the common man in India.
These criminal ruling gangsters develop a sinister and cunning strategy in maintaining the corrupt practices. The anti national foreign owned media protect these anti national criminals and engage in a blame game of the victims and engaged in a masterly designed psychological war to misdirect the public. They often support repressive-corrupt political parties and blame the victims, the majority Hindus
This status quo is undesirable and unacceptable. But the corrupt anti-national political parties and the bogus media view these alarming problems as unproblematic. Many adverse conditions vary in intensity and affect the majority Hindus. This causes serious discomfort most of the time.
Anarchists, Maoists, Naxals, vagabonds, miscreants, counterfeiters, and subversive groups are aided, managed and directed by our enemies. They are creating havoc in many regions of the country. These misinformed miscreants and saboteurs are bent on destroying our society and shamelessly destabilize our nation. These misinformed agents of our enemies have determined to use bombs, explosives and modern weapons on innocent civilians thus destroying the social fabric and put poor people in the lurch.
The dogmatic ideologies of Jihadis, Conversion gang and the Marxists and restrictive policies of the bogus secular government have harmed Hindus and the nation. But they have never borne the blame. They harm the social environment, culture and the nation and the corrupt congress government is eager to cover up the fact.
IDEOLOGY DETERMINES PROBLEM DEFINITION AND SOLUTIONS
The mass media and political parties are selective in their choice of definition and solution to these social problems. They ignore alarming social problems and blame peace loving, passive Hindus, thus preventing Hindus from new forms of collective social actions. Most of the radio, television and news papers are controlled by foreigners (Muslims, Christens and radical Marxists) the issues become complicated and they misinterpret our social problems. The Corrupt Congress party, and anti national regional parties like DMK, BSP, SP and Marxist party constantly blame our social organizations like VHP, RSS and spiritual leaders like Baba Ram Dev, Sri Ravi Shankar, Swami Viswesara Thritha, who promote peace, social responsibility and eradication of corruption, black money, jihadi terrorism, and coercive religious conversion. They promote national integration and our eternal Dharma emphasizing a reverence for the cumulative wisdom of our society, traditions, and valuable institutions. These nationalist organizations and spiritual leaders promote positive virtue, freedom, and oppose intolerance of the dogmatist fundamentalists.
Today anti Hindutva has been a major tenet of the phony secular ideology of the Congress party, DMK, Marxists, and BSP. They consider law abiding, peace loving, tolerant Hindus as a threat to our economic system and national integration. The reason for the corrupt ruling elite to blame Hindus is obvious. Hindus are becoming active and assertive and attempt to put an end to looting, corruption, and resist unscrupulous means by the anti national parties for domination.
The corrupt Congress rulers, and regional warlords seek India in which there is no peace, stability, but they also try to appease Muslims, Christians and mischief mongers. The media also engage in psychological warfare to keep Hindus passive, and indolent. Their apathy, indifference and irrational tolerance create opportunities for continued looting, corruption, coercive religious conversion, border disorder, social crisis, Jihadi terrorism, and the introduction of valueless values.
Several regional parties and the Marxists are a threat to our spiritual tradition and our democratic-political cultural system and individual freedoms. Their willingness to use unscrupulous means to obtain control of the country and domination is a major justification for a social revolution to establish Ram Rajya. The western Christian governments seek an India in which there are opportunities for Western Business interests. Corrupt Indian politicians support efforts of the western capitalists and do not question the overall framework to destabilize India or western involvement in creating internal conflicts.
The Hindu concept of human nature and the nation is different. Hindus do not have a jaundiced view of human nature. Hindus are passive, peace loving, tolerant and secular. This trait is often portrayed in a negative light, but more frequently corrupt and crooked politicians consider this passive trait as essential to continue their corrupt practices.
THE WAY OUT
The problems hurting India could have been avoided or mitigated by effective approaches based on Hindu thinking. Yet, in each case the corrupt anti national bogus congress leader’s approach is not to admit failure-but to condemn Hindu thinking, deny the problem exists, blame it on Hindus or even to claim as victory. Lately the corrupt politicians have one answer to all pertinent questions “Blame the Victim-the Hindus”. But it’s not a one-size fits-all answer to all serious questions. The ruling crooks have no ground breaking new plan to bring back billions of rupees stashed abroad, recover billions of rupees looted from the treasury hoarded by criminal politicians and immoral bureaucrats and to unearth black money as well as to prevent corruption.
These ruling elites are bent on destroying our nation by continuing discrediting our spiritual leaders, Hindu organizations with solid and sensible and right plan for India.
The truth demonstrates that there is still hope of replacing corrupt-criminal and fraudulent politicians by cornering and containing them. Hindus should unite and strong social sanction-both formal and informal should be imposed on them. A force continuum shall be applied to eliminate or put them in restrictive environment to save the nation and our eternal Dharma. Hindus are morally right in taking appropriate practically necessary social revolution. A social revolution based on our culture will make a major contribution to the rising of social-political-moral consciousness throughout India. The aroused public can make a difference. It will eliminate corrupt politicians; liberate our temples and powerful institutions from the control of criminal. It is natural for Hindus to act in this way.
Digvijay Singh : The Ignoble Rajput
Dr. Vijaya Rajiva
The once glorious Indian National Congress, and the once glorious Rajputs, are both at the lowest ebb of their respective traditions as seen in two members of the Congress Party. The choice of Sonia Gandhi as President of the Party was a hapless one. The present writer has written about her unsuitability for Indian conditions. Unlike the intrepid freedom fighter for Indian independence, the Irish stalwart Annie Besant, who had immersed herself in Hindu India’s traditions, Sonia continued to nurture her monotheistic superstitions, thanks to the fact that her general education was non existent.It is not certain whether she has even a high school degree, or that she even took the diploma from the foreign language school in Cambridge town where the good nuns from Italy had sent her hoping that she would become an au pair girl or a domestic. Nor did she make an effort to study Indian history and Bharat’s culture and civilization. She locked herself into a solitude, surrounded by dubious characters. This was not her choice one hopes and her subsequent incursions into the murky side of a corrupt Congress led her down the unavoidable slippery slope. And as some commentators have observed, her mask has finally fallen, with the vicious attack on a Hindu Yoga guru and his peaceful followers on the night of June 4. That event is indeed the turning point. Hindu India will never forgive her , nor should they ever forget. Since she has kept her Italian passport( as alleged) then one can only pray that she does not return from her recent trip to Switzerland. India does not need anymore mafia donnas !
Digvijay Singh offers a marked contrast. One could depict him as a clown, except the seriousness of his slippery slope is also an insult to the Rajput tradition of loyalty to their country and heroic history. One does not even dare to mention the sacred name of a Rana Pratap, in this context of a Rajput gone bad. Unlike Sonia he had a heroic tradition to look up to and live by. What actually happened is a different story altogether.
Congress’s attack dog is hiding behind the strength of his master/mistress’s temporary popularity. As her fortunes ebb, the rats will leave the sinking ship.No doubt he will be the first. Till then he has some time and he is making the most of it. One has to only look at the sorry spectacle of a Rajput demeaning a Hindu Yoga guru, while simultaneously speaking of Bin Laden as Bin Ladenji. It is also reported by one perceptive journalist that it was Chidambaram and the exRajput who stood behind Sonia’s decision to attack Baba Ramdev.
The names this pitiful individual reserved for the Hindu Yoga Guru Baba Ramdev were ‘thug’ and ‘fraud’.
Under Sonia Gandhi’s 12 year reign of terror for the Hindus of India, this is possibly only one more example of anything goes. As long as it is someone from the majority community everything is fair game. But he is also playing a double game. During the satyagraha of the Yoga Guru in the first week of June, Digvijay Singh tried to fool the Hindu masses by using the phrase ‘ Hamare Sanatana Dharma’ (Our Sanatana Dharma).Who is he fooling. ? He is listed in the Wikipedia biography as Christian. He is a convert, presumably.
Now, there are thousands of Indian Christians who have stayed loyal to Bharat. They merely changed their religion, but their ancestral memories (unlike Sonia’s) are of Bharat. And by and large they have remained respectful and even appreciative of their Hindu ancestry, except when misled by missionary propaganda. Digvijay is also in addition an anomaly as a Rajput ( he is listed as a Rajput in the biographical entry).
Hindu India must continue to challenge this fraud. He is seeking the Muslim vote in Uttar Pradesh. Hence his visits to the area soon after 26/11. Here he is also in sync with his protégé, Rahul Gandhi, who we are told was partying all night at a friend’s wedding on the night of 26/11. The mother son duo and their faithful lackey have no interest in Bharat.
No self respecting Rajput would have called a Hindu Guru, a thug ! Only a depraved fallen Rajput obeying the whims of his mistress would do that.
(The writer is a Political Philosopher who taught at a Canadian university)
Congress is shameless and has become a habitual liar: Maneka Gandhi
PTI
Terming the Congress-led government as "shameless" and a "habitual liar", BJP MP Maneka Gandhi today said the police action on yoga guru Ramdev in Delhi shows how low the government can stoop to.
"Congress is shameless and has become a habitual liar," Maneka told reporters while reacting on Delhi police affidavit in the Supreme Court regarding taking action against yoga guru Ramdev and his supporters at Ramlila ground in Delhi on June 5.
"Baba Ramdev staged satyagraha after taking due permission. There could be nothing more shameless than the government using lathis on saints and seers," Maneka alleged.
Crores of people watched the entire incident on the news channels in which several people were injured in police lathicharge, she said.
Attacking the Congress general secretary Digvijay Singh, she said that he has his own agenda and does not think before speaking.
"It seems that he has become voice of some other person and this should be probed throughly," the BJP leader alleged.
Thursday, June 16, 2011
Sonia Gandhi : The Albatross Round India’s Neck
Dr. Vijaya Rajiva
Nitin Gadkari BJP President called Sonia a “symbol of fascism”. Jayanti Natarajan , spokesperson for the Congress retaliated by referring to Gadkari’s gutter politics and called for an apology. Ofcourse, Ms.Natarajan whom the present writer has heard belting out the most inane statements on television, has chosen the wrong words this time round also.
It is clear that the Congress stands for the urban elite and no longer for the aam admi. The vicious , savage attack on a Hindu Yoga guru and his followers at Ramlila grounds is ample evidence of that. Baba Ramdev comes from an OBC caste and many of his followers at the peaceful rally on June 5, 2011 are from what is called the lower middle class. This is middle India and Congress has no time for this India. Its President, ofcourse, did originally hail from the bottommost rung of Italian society. Neverthless, her marriage to the son of a well established Indian family made it possible for her to reach the highest levels of power, and now it would seem (if allegations are true) that she has also become a very wealthy woman. All, at the expense of middle and poor India which has been defrauded by the various scams that she too has beeen participant of, if the allegations are true. The matter is now with the Courts and one can await the results. The latest report on the movements of both her and her son are revealing. They are supposedly on holiday in a certain part of Switzerland (known for its dubious banking arrangements) and the speculation is that the duo are there to take care of their finances !
Ms Natarajan, does not seem to know the history of her own once glorious party, the Indian National Congress. It is now filled with dubious characters, the most vocal of them being Digivijay Singh. There are others too. The skeletons will be falling out of the cupboard before long.
But the star of the show is Sonia. Middle India put up with the excesses of the present Congress Party in its monetary and financial corruption. And on June 5 it suffered the excesses of fascism. Nitin Gadkari was right on target in using the word ‘fascism.’
If fascism can be defined as the combination of political power and high finance, then the present Congress and its president are embodiments of fascism. And when the government launches a savage attack on an unarmed peaceful crowd in the middle of the night, then one sees fascism’s terrified response to its own misdeeds being found out.
Sonia’s unfortunate entanglement in Indian politics is not likely to continue much longer. The Congress has gone into damage control mode and mistaking the temporary subsiding of Baba Ramdev’s satyagraha for victory it has become complacent. But this whistling in the dark is just that, a whistling in the dark.It won’t be long before it drops Sonia from its visible high profile posts, if it plans to survive into the next election.
Not just middle India, but all of India, except the Congress and its camp followers, are alert to the Party’s misdeeds. More will come out if an alert Opposition remains vigilant.
Dr. Subramania Swamy’s legal battles are always backed by substantial evidence. His moving the Court concerning Sonia Gandhi will produce substantial results. Other individuals are also speaking out.
Indians, as a people, must now reflect seriously on the fact that an Italian Catholic, who has not shed her monotheistic superstitions, cannot understand the vast and complex country that she was fated to link herself to. As a result she has been an easy target for careerists, opportunists, and fanatics in the Congress Party. She is especially vulnerable to other monotheists both in her personal circle and her national political circle. A quick google search tells one that her main attack dog Digvijay Singh is listed as a Christian.
Her personal advisor a Mr. Ahmed, is a Muslim. Her inner circle is composed of people who it is reported,belong to the minority communities. There are ofcourse, also the hangers on, waiting for crumbs from the high table and these are from all denominations and religions. The Minister for Railways went so far as to say that lighting a Hindu lamp at ceremonies should be scrapped. Some members of the minority, such as famed singer Jesudasan, got up and left that meeting in protest at the Minister’s statement.
Even the ‘secular’ Jawaharlal Nehru did not go that far. Lighting Hindu lamps has been an age old tradition in India, since time immemorial.
It is not just in these smaller details that Sonia reveals herself. Almost daily one hears reports of Christian evangelical groups being given free access to the country, the most recent one being the approval given to a US based Christian evangelist group, Word of God Fellowship Inc., to launch a non news channel in India. The approval was given by the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB). Then there is the recently released draft of the Communal Bill which is heavily weighted against the Hindu population. It should be pointed out that some dubious characters were on the committee that put forward this draft Bill. One of them is the infamous Teesta Setalvad who has been charged by the SIT with bribing witnesses, perjury, coercion etc. There are known anti Hindu personages such as John Dayal there.
Hindus may get complacent with the fact that their great and ancient civilization( the only one that remains standing in today’s world) in the past, has withstood conquests, murder and mayhem, the destruction of their great temples and conversion at the point of the sword, of their population. But today, both jihad and Christian conversion inside India has an additional support from the non nationalist elements of the ruling and upper middle classes, who are wedded to globalization and neo liberalism. To put it in less opaque terms, the concerned Hindu can no longer support globalization and the excesses of neo liberalism. Expecting support from the Left parties is also a misstep since their internationalism is a variant of the liberal position in Indian politics. Their nationalism is on the surface only.
It is time that the Hindus of India voted down the albatross : a moribund and corrupt political party and its president.
( The writer is a Political Philosopher who taught at a Candian university)
Foreign writer opens our eyes: Loot of Hindu Temples by Secular Governments
http://vicharak1.wordpress.com/
The Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Act of 1951 allows State Governments and politicians to take over thousands of Hindu Temples and maintain complete control over them and their properties. It is claimed that they can sell the temple assets and properties and use the money in any way they choose A charge has been made not by any Temple authority, but by a foreign writer, Stephen Knapp in a book (Crimes Against India and the Need to Protect Ancient Vedic Tradition) published in the United States that makes shocking reading.
Hundreds of temples in centuries past have been built inIndia by devout rulers and the donations given to them by devotees have been used for the benefit of the (other) people. If, presently, money collected has ever been misused (and that word needs to be defined), it is for the devotees to protest and not for any government to interfere. This latter is what has been happening currently under an intrusive law.
It would seem, for instance, that under a Temple Empowerment Act, about 43,000 temples in Andhra Pradesh have come under government control and only 18 per cent of the revenue of these temples have been returned for temple purposes, the remaining 82 per cent being used for purposes unstated.
Apparently even the world famous TirumalaTirupati Temple has not been spared. According to Knapp, the temple collects over Rs 3,100 crores every year and the State Government has not denied the charge that as much as 85 per cent of this is transferred to the State Exchequer, much of which goes to causes that are not connected with the Hindu community. Is it for this that devotees make their offering to the temples? Another charge that has been made is that the Andhra Government has also allowed the demolition of at least ten temples for the construction of a golf course. Imagine the outcry writes Knapp, if ten mosques had been demolished.
It would seem that in Karanataka, Rs. 79 crores were collected from about two lakh temples and from that, temples received Rs seven crores for their maintenance, Muslim madresas and Haj subsidy were given Rs 59 crores and churches about Rs 13 crores. Very generous of the government.
Because of this, Knapp writes, 25 per cent of the two lakh temples or about 50,000 temples in Karnataka will be closed down for lack of resources, and he adds: The only way the government can continue to do this is because people have not stood up enough to stop it.
Knapp then refers to Kerala where, he says, funds from the Guruvayur Temple are diverted to other government projects denying improvement to 45 Hindu temples. Land belonging to the Ayyappa Temple, apparently has been grabbed and Church encroaches are occupying huge areas of forest land, running into thousands of acres, near Sabarimala.
A charge is made that the Communist state government of Kerala. wants to pass an Ordinance to disband the Travancore & Cochin Autonomous Devaswom Boards (TCDBs) and take over their limited independent authority of 1,800 Hindu temples. If what the author says is true, even the Maharashtra Government wants to take over some 450,000 temples in the state which would supply a huge amount of revenue to correct the states bankrupt conditions.
And to top it all, Knapp says that in Orissa, the state government intends to sell over 70,000 acres of endowment lands from the Jagannath Temple, the proceeds of which would solve a huge financial crunch brought about by its own mismanagement of temple assets.
Says Knapp: Why such occurrences are so often not known is that the Indian media, especially the English television and press, are often anti-Hindu in their approach, and thus not inclined to give much coverage, and certainly no sympathy, for anything that may affect the Hindu community. Therefore, such government actions that play against the Hindu community go on without much or any attention attracted to them.
Knapp obviously is on record. If the facts produced by him are incorrect, it is up to the government to say so. It is quite possible that some individuals might have set up temples to deal with lucrative earnings. But that, surely, is none of the governments business? Instead of taking over all earnings, the government surely can appoint local committees to look into temple affairs so that the amount discovered is fairly used for the public good?
Says Knapp: Nowhere in the free, democratic world are the religious institutions managed, maligned and controlled by the government, thus denying the religious freedom of the people of the country. But it is happening in India. Government officials have taken control of Hindu temples because they smell money in them, they recognize the indifference of Hindus, they are aware of the unlimited patience and tolerance of Hindus, they also know that it is not in the blood of Hindus to go to the streets to demonstrate, destroy property, threaten, loot, harm and kill Many Hindus are sitting and watching the demise of their culture. They need to express their views loud and clear Knapp obviously does not know that should they do so, they would be damned as communalists. But it is time some one asked the Government to lay down all the facts on the table so that the public would know what is happening behind its back. Robbing Peter to pay Paul is not secularism. And temples are not for looting, under any name. One thought that Mohammad of Ghazni has long been dead.
मर्यादा का उल्लंघन
Tarun Vijay
कांग्रेसी नेताओं ने बाबा रामदेव और अन्ना हजारे के विरुद्ध जिस प्रकार के शब्दों का इस्तेमाल किया उससे सार्वजनिक जीवन में अभद्रता और अशालीनता का ही घनत्व बढ़ा है। पर इसमें कांग्रेस के लिए कुछ भी नया नहीं है। राजकाज में हिंदू जीवन मूल्यों के प्रति घोर अपमान तथा तिरस्कार का भाव रखने वाली कांग्रेस ने बाबा लोगों के राजनीति में इस्तेमाल को प्राय: एक संस्थागत रूप ही दे दिया है। डालडा में घी की चर्बी, जाली और अशास्त्रीय शंकराचायरें के अयोध्या आंदोलन में घोर हिंदू हित विरोधी बयानों का प्रचार, राम सेतु तोड़ने के विषय पर अपने घरेलू संतों के इस्तेमाल आदि की अनेक घटनाएं इसकी पुष्टि करती हैं।
वर्तमान समय में राजनीति के कलुष का ही यह प्रभाव है कि सार्वजनिक हित के मुद्दों पर राजनेताओं के बजाय योगी-संन्यासियों को आगे आना पड़ रहा है। उनका किसी भी राजनीतिक दल से संबंध न रखना न तो जन हित में है और न ही इससे उनके आंदोलन को व्यापक जन समर्थन मिल सकेगा। राजनेताओं पर आम आदमी का विश्वास उठ गया है। इस सार्वजनिक जीवन की शुचिता और साख बनाए रखने लिए भी यह जरूरी है कि बाबा रामदेव तथा अन्ना हजारे जैसे आंदोलन गैर राजनीतिक रंग के रहे और उनको समर्थन देने के द्वार सभी राजनीतिक दलों के लिए खुले रहें।
संप्रग सरकार भ्रष्टाचार के प्रश्न पर बुरी तरह घिर गई है। भ्रष्टाचार व महंगाई से ध्यान भटकाने के लिए वह नए-नए मुद्दे खड़े करती रहती है। बाबा रामदेव और उनके अनुयायियों पर मध्य रात्रि में किया गया प्रहार भ्रष्टाचार पर चर्चा को ढकने के लिए किया गया। इस घोर सांप्रदायिक आचरण पर कांग्रेस को भयंकर सार्वजनिक निंदा का शिकार होना पड़ा। इसके बावजूद दिग्विजय सिंह जैसे लोगों के अपमानजनक बयान आते ही रहे। यदि बाबा रामदेव के स्थान पर उसी स्थान पर, उसी मुद्दे को लेकर कोई मुस्लिम मौलाना अनशन पर बैठा होता तो क्या कांग्रेस राज में उस पर इस प्रकार का अत्याचार होता? निश्चित रूप से उस समय कांग्रेस के यही नेता अपने हिंदू विरोधी सांप्रदायिक चेहरे के साथ उसके पास चिकन बिरयानी लेकर पहुंचते। इसी प्रकार 1967 में कांग्रेस के राज में गौहत्या निषेध के लिए देश भर से आए साधू-संतों पर भयंकर लाठी चार्ज और गोलीबारी की गई थी। मीनाक्षीपुरम की घटना पर भी कांग्रेस ने इसी प्रकार का सांप्रदायिक चेहरा दिखाया था। अयोध्या आंदोलन के विरुद्ध तथा ऑपरेशन ब्ल्यू स्टार के वक्त भी कांग्रेस का ऐसा ही सांप्रदायिक घृणा का रुख सामने आया था। जो कांग्रेस हिंदू संगठनों के विरुद्ध जहर उगलती है और उसके नेता उनके बारे में अभद्र शब्दों का सार्वजनिक इस्तेमाल करते हैं, वही कांग्रेस आजादी के बाद पहली ऐसी सरकार बनाती है, जिसमें भारत विभाजन की दोषी मुस्लिम लीग को केंद्रीय मंत्रिमंडल में शामिल किया गया।
भारतीय माटी के रंग में रंगा कोई भी पहलू कांग्रेस के लिए तिरस्कार का पात्र ही रहा है। पाठकों को एनसीईआरटी के पाठ्यक्रम में भगवान महावीर, गुरु तेगबहादुर, भगत सिंह और पृथ्वीराज चौहान जैसे महापुरुषों के बारे में असत्य और अपमानजनक टिप्पणियों से कोई ऐतराज नहीं था लेकिन जब मुरली मनोहर जोशी ने इन गलतियों को ठीक करने का प्रयास प्रारंभ किया तो इसी कांग्रेस ने उन कम्युनिस्टों के साथ भगवाकरण का शोर मचाया था जिन कम्युनिस्टों ने 1962 में चीनी आक्रमण का साथ दिया था। भगवाकरण शब्द इस प्रकार इस्तेमाल किया गया मानो यह रंग राष्ट्रीयता का शत्रु हो। अब सोनिया गांधी की सहमति के साथ राष्ट्रीय सलाहकार परिषद, जो सत्ता और शासन का असैंवाधानिक मंच बन गई है, एक ऐसे हिंदू विरोधी अधिनियम को सामने ला रही जिससे हर गली मोहल्ले में सांप्रदायिक शत्रुता की दीवारें खड़ी हो जाएंगी। सांप्रदायिक हिंसा रोकने के नाम पर लाया जा रहा सांप्रदायिक हिंसा अधिनियम हिंदुओं और मुसलमानों को 1946-47 की तरह आमने-सामने शत्रुता के साथ खड़ा करने का षड़यंत्र है ताकि हर मोर्चे पर असफल पार्टी अब सांप्रदायिक नफरत फैला कर और स्वयं को मुसलमानों का एकमात्र संरक्षक जता कर उनके वोट हासिल कर सके।
इसी सप्ताह विदेशमंत्री एसएम कृष्णा ने घोषित किया है की हज पर जाने वाले यात्रियों का पासपोर्ट बिना किसी पुलिस जांच के बनाया जाएगा। यह एक आश्चर्यजनक बयान है। हज हो या कोई भी अन्य धार्मिक यात्रा, हर कोई सुविधा से जाए इसमें किसी को ऐतराज नहीं होना चाहिए। लेकिन क्या हर प्रकार की असंवैधानिक प्रक्रिया इसके लिए की जानी चाहिए? क्या किसी ने कभी सुना है कि कैलाश मानसरोवर, ननकाना साहेब, ढाकेश्वरी यात्रा, शादानी दरबार की पाकिस्तान यात्रा, माता हिंगलाज मंदिर के दर्शन के लिए बलूचिस्तान यात्रा के लिए सरकार ने एक बार भी कोई अतिरिक्त सुविधा देने की घोषणा की हो? क्या इस सरकार ने कभी कटास राज मंदिर यात्रा के लिए कोई पहल की है?
इस वातावरण में राजनीतिक दलों को भी अपने अहंकार छोड़ कर देश हित में अपने कामकाज और व्यवहार को बदलने के बारे में विचार करना चाहिए। सार्वजनिक जीवन में शब्दों की शालीनता और सभ्यता का व्यवहार लोकतंत्र की जमीन होती है। लेकिन परास्त मानसिकता के साथ कांग्रेस ने इस संपूर्ण वातावरण को निहायत घटिया स्तर पर उतार दिया है।
[तरुण विजय: लेखक राज्यसभा के सदस्य हैं]
Wednesday, June 15, 2011
The right to life and liberty is not merely a minority right
Anand Srinivas
To the National Advisory Council
Sub: REPRESENTATIONS AGAINST THE PREVENTION OF COMMUNAL AND TARGETED VIOLENCE (ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND REPARATIONS) BILL, 2011
Sir,
The intention of the Bill is laudable-i.e. to prevent communal and targeted violence and alleviate human suffering and to enforce the rule of law. However, there are some fatal flaws in the Bill.
1.The right to life and liberty enshrined in Article 20 of the Constitution is the fundamental right of every citizen and not merely that of a citizen belonging to religious or linguistic minority, in any State in the Union of India, or Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The right to life and liberty is not merely a minority right and cannot be equated with article 30 which deals with rights of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions. Every citizen, whether belonging to a majority group or minority group is entitled to protection from communal and targeted violence and to receive reparations in case of loss of life in communal violence. Therefore, defining the “group” to only cover “religious or linguistic minority, in any State in the Union of India, or Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes” is blatant discrimination against those who do not belong to “religious or linguistic minority, in any State in the Union of India, or Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes”. It becomes a license in the hands of a religious minority or linguistic minority to resort to violence against the majority community.
2.Clause 2(j) of the Bill defines victim as “ any person belonging to a group as defined under this Act, who has suffered physical, mental, psychological or monetary harm or harm to his or her property as a result of the commission of any offence under this Act, and includes his or her relatives, legal guardian and legal heirs, wherever appropriate”. Human suffering is the same whether the sufferer/victim be a hindu / muslim/ Christian /Sikh/atheist/anyome . This absurd definition of victim assume that only minorities suffer victimhood when majority community attacks them and that the majority community never suffers when minorities get violent with them. To discriminate between victims based on which community they belong is inhuman and goes against all tenets of humanity and constitution.
3. The definition of “hostile environment against a group” in clause 2(f) of the Bill inter alia includes “ (i) boycott of the trade or businesses of such person or making it otherwise difficult for him or her to earn a living”. This is ridiculous for a number of reasons as under:
(a)It is only too well-known that Christians and muslims are opposed to idol worship and Hindus believe in idol worship. Hindus, by their very nature, do not compel others to follow idol worship. But some fanatical Christians and fanatical muslims go to the extent of defacing or damaging idols worshipped by hindus. In fact Quran narrates the story of Prophet Abraham opposing idol worship by smashing idols worshipped by his people. So, if Hindus are aggrieved by any such acts of defilement of their idols, boycott of trade or business of offending minority community is moral and legitimate reaction while the so-called “retaliatory violence” against the minority community is immoral and illegitimate. This measure of economic boycott is consistent with the principles of ahimsa and is moral and will actually prevent communal violence against minority.
(b)Ultimately, a member of majority community has a right to decide whom he will hire or from whom he will buy as it involves his pocket. Nobody can force him to buy from any particular person on the grounds of secularism or secular fabric. If a majority community member decides not to buy from a minority community shop, he is merely exercising his choice and in no way this is any indignity on the minority member.
(c)This provision can be easily abused against any community. A muslim/Christian may put up a beef shop in an area where only hindus, Buddhists and jains reside. They may not buy beef from him for obvious reason. Or they may approach local police station and file a case for hurting religious sentiments and police may close the beef shop. The “aggrieved” muslim/Christian would simply invoke this “boycott of the trade or businesses of such person or making it otherwise difficult for him or her to earn a living”. Clause. Again a muslim can set up a halal meat shop in a Christian-majority or hindu-majority state. Hindus/ Christians may consider the halal method of slaughter as cruel to the animals and avoid buying halal meet. The “aggrieved” muslim can invoke these provisions against the Hindus/Christians.
4. Clause 8 of the Bill deals with hate propaganda. “ whoever publishes, communicates or disseminates by words, either spoken or written, or by signs or by visible representation or otherwise acts inciting hatred causing clear and present danger of violence against a group or persons belonging to that group, in general or specifically, or disseminates or broadcasts any information, or publishes or displays any advertisement or notice, that could reasonably be construed to demonstrate an intention to promote or incite hatred or expose or is likely to expose the group or persons belonging to that group to such hatred, is said to be guilty of hate propaganda”. If this definition is applied to Quran, it clearly amounts to hate propaganda against Jews, Christians, Idol worshippers (hindus/ Buddhists /jains) as its verses precisely do what is mentioned in clause 8 of the Bill. In fact, I am supported in this stand by the views of Christian authors like Robert Spencer of www.jihadwtch.org and www.answering-islam.org . Also I am supported in my views by ex-muslims like ,M.A.Khan who runs www.islam-watch.org .
Not only that, Sultan Shahin of www.newageislam.com , a progressive muslim admits that these violent and hate-preaching verses of Quran are a problem and wants the ulema(muslim scholars) to declare a fatwa that these verses are no longer valid for modern times. Sultan Shahin’s article “Indian Ulema have no time to lose, must call warlike Quranic surahs obsolete”can be accessed here at the following link
http://newageislam.com/NewAgeIslamArticleDetail.aspx?ArticleID=787
In the above link, Sultan Shahin gives a complete list of controversial verses from Quran which preach hate and violence against non-muslims. This Bill would prevent ex-muslims, progressive muslims from speaking out and may suppress their voice and hamper the efforts of ex-muslims, progressive muslims and non-muslims in fihting jihadist terror.
Conclusion
Communal violence is indeed a blot on secular society and must be prevented. But that is a multi-dimensional problem. A half-baked law like the Communal Violence Bill may actually end up giving minorities an incentive to indulge in communal violence against minorities. The existing provisions of Indian Penal Code,1860 must be enforced strictly and police force should be professionalized and come under an independent Police Commission which should be as independent as Election Commission. We all know what a wonderful job the independent Election Commission has done. The Police recruitment, transfers etc should be under an independent Police Commission whose status shall be guaranteed under the Constitution. These will solve the problem better than half-baked Communal Violence Bill.
I would also like to depose personally before the NAC. You may communicate to me at my e-mail address.
Thanking You
Yours faithfully
Srinivasan Anand.G.
Monday, June 13, 2011
Wake up India !
Dr Babu Suseelan
Wake up India! A corrupt, despotic, anti Indian criminals are misdirecting, mismanaging and misguiding our citizens. An uneducated Italian Catholic lady is determining the destiny of billions of Hindus. Most Hindus sense a danger-a loss of control, and erosion of moral-ethical-Dharma values, a social drift. Power is concentrated in the hands of few anti Hindu criminals and Sonia cronies. We need a systematic and assertive plan to get rid of these miscreants, vagabonds, criminals and corrupt politicians who act without guilt, remorse or fear. They cannot be changed through unconditional positive regard, non judgmental attitude or passive fasting. We need to corner them contain them and a force continuum shall be applied to remove them from power. In this eternal struggle, good is still on one end of the spectrum and evil on the other. The Sonia gang is giving a false sense of becoming nationalist leaders through their illogical reasoning. It is time for the majority to kick out these anti national criminal politicians. In a democracy citizens should get rid of their apathy, indifference, denial, and gloom.
Why repeats the battle cry the for removal of the corrupt congress party and its Italian born Catholic Sonia? We need to hit the veil of secrecy of the corrupt congress party and its Italian catholic leader acting as an agent of the Vatican. Psychologically programmed people should be told and retold to become motivated and invigorated to avoid armageddon. When the mafia groups took control of India and looting our wealth, the facts should be repeatedly told to educate, inform and empower the public. What should we do when the elitist group repeatedly brainwash our public, misdirect them engage in a deliberate continuous and constant psychological war through the media? We need to present real facts in a fiery, challenging, and persuasive manner to wake up our sleeping citizens who are subjected to oppression for hundreds of years. We need to expose the corrupt Sonia gang and money lords who pull the strings. It is time to sounds the call to choose: allow the conspirators to continue or empower the public for strong action.
A conspiracy runs the Indian government. The decay in Indian politics goes beyond the ethically challenged Italian Fascist Sonia,.Corruption permeates the Judiciary, denfese forces, bureocracy and the police. That suggest a malignancy cannot be excised with pacifism. The far-reaching issue before us today is what we plan to do about the criminal gang ruining our culture and the country. It is time for all citizens to arm themselves with a plan to remain free of coercion, fear and indifference. Remove the social-political apathy that has created the fertile soil for the corrupt politicians to survive.
Wake up India. It is time to choose-corruption or empowerment. Action or inaction. Our Dharma or slow death.
Sunday, June 12, 2011
Why secret Foreign Trips of Sonia and Raul ignored by Media?
In a Nation where the paid Media celebrates the Adventures of Raul in 'Cattle Class' compartments and 'Dalit Homes' keeps a dangerous silence about the Foreign trips of 'Mother and Son'.
Raul is now back from his secret Foreign trip and now Sonia is out of the country , somewhere in Europe. The where about's of this Super PM had never bothered the nosy media or investigative journalists in the country.
These secret Trips are happening when there are serious allegations about the share of 2G Loot received by Sonia & Co. and about the Multi Billion Dollar secret swiss accounts.
The Indian Media out of sheer fear of a gamut of reprisals is silent on the secret trips overseas always via Dubai that Sonia and her children make. Rahul is reported informally to go abroad more often. But the secrecy surrounding the movement in and out of India by Sonia's own Italian family members and the activities in India of Sonia and her personal family are becoming a matter for reasonable suspicion in democratic India. It is time some one files a RTI application on some aspects of Sonia's movements and activities.
Muslim appeaser politicians turning India into an Islamic State, Part 1
Dr Radhasyam Brahmachari
Origin of the politics of Muslim appeasement:
It has been mentioned in earlier articles that, though in a democratic country, an individual has the right, and also expected to cast his/her vote in favour of a political party of his/her personal choice, the Muslims do not follow this golden rule. On the contrary, they cast their votes according to the dictates of the religious and community leaders and as a result, all Muslim votes go for a single political party. As soon as this quantum of Muslim block votes becomes a deciding factor for winning and losing election, all the political parties start wooing the Muslims so that they may cast their votes in its favour and in this way, the politics of Muslim appeasement gains momentum.
In the political scenario of India, Muslim appeasement by the Indian National Congress (INC) is more than a century old- story and Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, after his return from South Africa in 1915, began this nasty politics in a big way through extending the support of NIC for the so called Khilafat Movement launched y the Muslim Khan brothers. In 1947, the Congress leaders yielded to the Muslim demand for creation of Pakistan, as separate homeland for the Muslims, to please the Muslims. Not only that, after partitioning India on the basis of religion, the next appropriate step was to follow an exchange of population – sending the entire Muslim population to Pakistan and bringing back all the non-Muslim population of Pakistan to divided India.
But that vital step could not be carried out due to utter obstinate and stiff opposition of Gandhi. It is needless to say that Gandhi supported staying the Muslims back into divided India so that NIC could win election and stay in power with the help of Muslim block votes. In reality, NIC could have stayed in power, except for brief period from 1999 to 2004, when BJP led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) could win 1999 election and came to power. For rest of the time, NIC could secure Muslims’ votes by constant allurement of concession and privilege for the Muslims.
Muslim appeasement by the Government of India:
In the West, the politicians who are engaged in appeasing the Muslims for their block votes, are identified as broad minded multiculturists, while those who oppose Muslim appeasement and try to uncover the true face of Islam, are designated as despicable racists. In Indian politics, politicians belonging to the first category are called secularists and those belonging to the second category, are called dirty communal people. So, in India, Muslim appeasement is going on under the dignified cover of secularism and the NIC and the Leftist parties are forerunners in the field secularism. India is the largest democracy in the world and the democratic Constitution of India sanctions equal opportunity for its citizens, irrespective of religion, caste, linguistic, regional and other differences. But the secular political parties and the secular politicians are trampling this sacrosanct principles of democracy and going on appeasing the Muslims with unlawful and undemocratic privileges and concessions.
For example, on December 18, 2009, the Central Government declared 10 per cent government job quota for the Muslims (The Statesman – Dec 19, 2009). In fact, NIC declared reservation of 15 per cent government jobs for the minority communities, 10% for the Muslims and 5% for the Christians. About 2 years back, the Central Government declared easy bank loans for the Muslims (The Times of India – Jan 18, 2007). About 6 months later, P Chidamvaram, the then Finance Minister, instructed the banks to speed up the scrutiny of loan application by the Muslims and disburse the loans.
In 2009 and 2010, the Central Government increased the funds allotments for the minority (read Muslim) affairs by 74%. A notification by the Minority Affairs Ministry, in this regard, said, “The Plan outlay for Ministry of Minority Affairs has been enhanced from Rs 1,000 crore in 2008-09 to Rs 1,740 crore in 2009-10 registering an increase of 74 per cent.” A report by the Indian Express, a leading Indian daily, on December 18, 2007, said, “Govt declared mega plan outlay for the Muslims- a package of Rs 3,780 crore for 90 Muslim dominated districts.” Another report appeared on November 9, 2007, in the Ananda Bazar Patrika, a leading Kolkata based Bengali daily, said, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh declared more additional funds for the Muslims.
The appeasement has also been introduced in the field of education. It is field where merit should be the only criterion for admission of students in reputed educational institutions, otherwise, the gross intellectual level of education must decline. Indian Institute of Technology or IITs are the most reputed and prestigious technological institutions in India. There are 5 IITs in the country where admission is done on the basis of stiff admission tests. On June 28, 2008, the Human Resource Development (HRD) ministry issued an order to Directors of IITs for faculty quota, for the Muslims.
It is well known that the level of education in the Islamic schools, called madrasas, is very low and not job oriented. The students of these madrasas learn Koran, Hadiths and other Islamic subjects. On July 7, 2008, Lalu Prasad Yadav, the then Railway Minister, declared that Madrasa degree would, now on, be valid for railway jobs. It is not difficult to understand that, such mindless job reservation would ultimately lead to appointment of inefficient people for responsible jobs. It is well known that, Muslims are fit for low grade jobs of unskilled laborers. That is the reason, a Muslim author has described the immigrant Muslim laborers in the Western countries as modern coolies. So, the Central Government is thinking of launching a program to improve the quality of education in madrasas by spending colossal funds. The goal of education in any country has to be creation of a socially conscious, educationally competent and professionally productive citizenry. But this target can never be achieved through madrasa education.
Muslim appeasement by the present UPA government:
With the help of the Muslim votes, the United Progressive Alliance (UPA), led by the INC, has come to power for the second time after winning the Parliamentary Election in 2009. So, it has decided to intensify the policy of Muslim appeasement and go ahead with minority development programs as promised during the election campaign. As a consequence, Muslim representation will be increased in education and in government jobs.
The secular and democratic constitution provides equal opportunity for all citizens, irrespective of religious, linguistic, ethnic or any difference. But the Government of India by trampling the provisions of Indian constitution and disregarding the universally accepted democratic principles and the Universal Declaration on Human Rights (1948) in its Article 26 (recognized it as a fundamental Human Right), is shamelessly declaring more and more privileges for the Muslims. As a matter of fact, the Congress Govt. in India, which has been in power during most of the past sixty years, is busy deflecting attention from its dismal failure to assure education for all children by adopting preferential treatment for selected minorities (read Muslims and Christians). It is not difficult to understand that this politically motivated strategy was engineered for improving its chances of staying in power with the help of Muslim block votes.
Preferential sanctions for Muslim Students:
Under this undemocratic and preferential system of the government, the scheduled cast students have been receiving lump sum grant as annual educational aid at the rate of Rs.140/- for lower primary level, Rs.220/- for upper primary level and Rs.330/- for the high school level. But the newly introduced plan of scholarships for minority students has elevated to Rs.10, 000/- per year limited to two students in a family whose annual income is less than one lakh rupees i.e. Rs 1,00,000).
More importantly, Muslim girls shall receive scholarship of Rs.3000/- at degree level, Rs.4000/- at post graduate level and Rs.5000/- for professional courses. Additionally, the Muslim girls shall receive stipend while preparing for competitive exams.
In case of higher studies like MBBS, PG courses and Research, the SC/ST students must get 60% marks to qualify for admission and are allowed a financial support of Rs. 3960 per year (Rs 330/ per month). But the religion based minorities need to have only 50% marks and the degree, PG students get Rs 6550/ per year while the M. Phil, Ph. D, students get Rs 35,100/ on yearly basis (attachment A). This inequality is extremely prejudicial to Hindu students and must be stopped immediately.
There are several additional discriminations against Hindu students. E.g.the Hindu students get educational loans at much higher interest rates i.e., 12 to 14 per cent per annum but minority students get student loan at 3 percent interest per annum from the National Minority Development & Finance Corporation under the Union Ministry of Finance.
In the field of commercial ventures for self-employment, a Hindu youth is entitled to get loans from commercial banks at 15 to 18 per cent interest rates and have to arrange ‘margin money’ of 15 to 40 per cent of the project cost from their private sources, balance comes from the bank. But minority youth have to put in only 5 per cent of project cost as margin money from their private source, other 35 percent is given by the National Minority Development & Finance Corporation at 3 percent interest,
As mentioned above, this division of Indian nation into religion based categories violates the sacrosanct principles of the Indian constitution. In fact, the irrational educational policy of the Govt. has now divided poor Indian students into three categories:
a) Preferred religious minorities (read Muslims and Christians) with high financial assistance;
b) SCs and STs on a lower level; and,
c) Total exclusion of students from poor Hindu families (all outside the first two categories) from the so-called upper castes, who don’t get assistance worth even a farthing.
“The preferential treatment to minority religionists – Muslims and Christians – while ignoring the poor Hindu students with similar economic status violates Article 15(1) which clearly stipulates that “The state shall not discriminate any citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them”. The Govt. cannot and must not be allowed to enforce the constitution selectively for benefiting its prospective voters”, says an analyst.
“Recognition of the Madrassa certificates on par with the CBSE and the SSLC – by the Sonia- Singh regime and calling it ‘inclusive ‘development’ is against national interest as it encourages a two society mindset : Madrassas fundamentally negate the secular philosophy and inflict a devastating body blow to the principles of Secularism. These radical Islamic institutions are globally recognized as the nucleus–initiating stage for furthering a skewed mindset into jihadi terrorism”, he adds.
Conclusion:
In India, the policy of Muslim appeasement is a two-pronged instrument, one prong is operated by the central government in Delhi and the other by the state governments in the respective states. The unlawful and undemocratic preferences and privileges are turning the majority Hindu community into third or fourth grade citizens and elevating the Muslims, in the name of minorities, into the first grade ones. These developments are turning India virtually into an Islamic state. Many affirm that India has already become an Islamic state, but yet to be officially declared.
Recently, the UPA government has drafted a draconian law, called the “Prevention of Communal and Targeted Violence (Access to Justice and Reparations) Bill, 2011” and if it becomes a law, the Hindus will be turned into slaves and the Muslims into the real rulers of the country. We hope to discuss this in a separate article.
Saturday, June 11, 2011
Why are Indians in denial about Sonia Gandhi ?
Dr. Vijaya Rajiva
It is difficult for Indians to accept the fact that the wife of former prime minister and grandson of Jawaharlal Nehru,Rajiv Gandhi, may not be a good fit for Indian politics. Here, we are not going to look into the question of why the Congress Party has surrounded her with a halo. In a televised program sometime ago the editor of Outlookindia, Vinod Mehta pointed out that it would be suicidal for the Congress Party to abandon Sonia since she led the party to victory in two elections. But with the recent shocking events of June 5, 20ll when a peaceful and nonviolent assembly of protestors at Baba Ramdev’s yoga camp were attacked by the Delhi police, presumably under the orders of a besotted Prime Minister (who has admitted to his culpability in the action) and the Congress President Sonia Gandhi (so the first reports alleged) there may be some rethinking in the Grand Old Party itself as to whether Sonia will continue to be a vote catcher or an albatross round its neck.
The present writer predicts that the Sonia magic will continue to be seriously dented. First reports on June 5, placed the responsibility squarely with the Congress President and with the Prime Minister. And although the Congress went into damage control to protect the image of their vote catcher, the skulduggery may not work this time around. Too much water has flown under the bridge
.
For the last few years Dr.Subramanian Swamy, President of the Janata Party, has worked tirelessly to unearth what he claims are facts about Sonia Gandhi. Any interested reader can go to the Janata Party website and acquaint themselves with his account. Dr. Swamy is known for his thoroughness and diligence, apart from his knowledge of the law. Sonia has never challenged his accounts. On the one occasion when a zealous youth congress in the U.S. took some Indians to court for false allegations against her, the case was dismissed /withdrawn, because it was a no show. The star witness herself declined to appear on the stands ! And as of now the whole question of her alleged involvement with corruption is with the Courts.Whether one accepts Dr. Swamy’s account or not regarding her activities, one thing is clear to anyone viewing the Indian scene with an impartial eye.
Sonia Gandhi originally came from a lower class family without much wealth. She was sent by the good nuns of a convent where she studied as all Italian Catholics of the time in her circumstances did, to Cambridge town in Britain where she studied English in a foreign language school set up for these purposes. The goal was for her to acquire enough facility in the English language to obtain a job as an au pair girl or a dometic etc., so the good nuns reasoned. It is not certain whether she actually completed the program in the school, which since then has closed down. Nor do we know whether she even has a high school diploma, since her past has been clothed in mystery. Indians for the longest time were fed with the story that she studied at Cambridge University. She did not.
Instead, she met Rajiv Gandhi who was studying at Cambridge University . She was working as a waitress in Cambridge town where Rajiv liked to spend his free time (so the story goes). Despite Indira Gandhi’s initial objections, they married. For the next 16 years Sonia stayed in India but did not take Indian citizenship. It was only much later that she became an Indian citizen, although she has not yet relinquished her Italian citizenship (if reports are true). This is in violation of the rules of Indian citizenship. Her son Rahul is reported to also carry dual citizenship.
A sinking Congress Party tried to project her as the next prime minister . While the Congress has duped the Indian public into thinking that it was a supreme act of sacrifice on Sonia’s part not to accept the nomination for the PM’s post, the real reason is that a loyal and courageous President Abul Kalam, who was presented with the legal tangle this would entail by Dr.Subramania Swamy,did not accept her nomination. The rest is history. In 1998 she became the President of the Congress Party.
And in the last year, the alleged involvement of Sonia’s Italian family (the sisters), in the Commonwealth scam , the alleged involvement of Sonia with the 2G scam, all of which are currently being taken up by Swamy at the level of the Courts, and the hints thrown out by senior lawyer Ram Jethmalani, all of this has further corroded the Sonia image. Ofcourse, the ghost of Bofors will not go away either.
Then, there are the various ways in which Sonia is alleged to have downgraded Hinduism. The present writer has already commented on how this is not surprising. She is an Italian Catholic and her historical memories and attachments are to the religion of her country of origin. Indian Catholics, on the other hand, are converts whose ancestral memories are that of Hindusthan. Sonia does not have the educational background to make up for her lack of understanding of Hindu India, unlike other Westerners such as Julia Roberts who are well informed and well educated about the country. In fact, the question may well be asked as to why Hindus expect Sonia to be friendly to Hindusthan, or to act differently. It seems to have been the easiest thing for her to do, the attack on a Hindu yoga guru and his followers, given that her familial training would be to despise pagans and such like. Had Sonia set aside her unfortunate monotheistic superstitions, she might not have acted the way she did.
Things are going to get worse, and not necessarily change for the better. The Congress’s attack dog Digvijay Singh continues to spew venom against the Hindu yoga Guru, and make dark comments about the RSS being behind every disaster in the country. But since the RSS and the Sangh Parivar organizations are not banned organizations in the country, their presence at various events is quite normal except when seen through the jaundiced eyes of Digvijay Singh. He too will be coming under increasing scrutiny. Already the reports in Wikipedia are being taken out and polished up for the reader and these do not tell a pretty story about the man.
But the puzzling question is why have Indians been in denial for so long ? The answer is: their embarssment that so unsuitable a person has acquired so much power in the governance of their country, without deserving this high honour. It has been remarked that even Atal Bihari Vajpayee BJP’s leader and then PM, did not put the country’s interests first when he quite easily let Rahul Gandhi off the hook during the 60,000 dollar imbroglio in the U.S.(so it is reported). Most likely he too did not want to tarnish the Gandhi family name.
Indians simply do not want to wash their dirty linen in public. But do they now have a choice ?
(The writer is a Political Philosopher who taught at a Canadian university).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)